Skip to content Skip to content Skip to content
  • About PBC
  • About Hogan
  • Blog
  • About PBC
  • About Hogan
  • Blog
Cart(0)
  • Our Services
  • Assessments
  • Certifications
  • Resources
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Get Certified
  • Our Services
  • Assessments
  • Certifications
  • Resources
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Get Certified
All Services
Selection
Development
Teams
Organisation
Coaching
Research
Cancel
Our Services
All Services
Selection
Development
Teams
Organisation
Coaching
Research
  • Our Services
  • Assessments
  • Certifications
  • Resources
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Get Certified
  • Our Services
  • Assessments
  • Certifications
  • Resources
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Get Certified
Cart(0)
  • About PBC
  • About Hogan
  • Blog
  • About PBC
  • About Hogan
  • Blog
BLOG

Managerial Competencies and Organisational Levels

I was talking recently with a very smart psychologist about IBM; I noted that IBMโ€™s stock has gone down steadily for the past six years, and he said: โ€œIBM is well managed but poorly led.โ€ This perceptive observation assumes that managersโ€™ jobs change as they move from supervisor to manager to executive.ย I have always thought that leadership is the same at any level, but many people believe that the roles of managers, and the competencies needed to perform in those roles, change as they advance in organisations.ย I know little about this, so I asked Rob Kaiser and, as usual, he was helpfulโ€”in part because he organised an entire issue ofย The Psychologist-Managerย Journalย (2011, Volume 14) on this subject.

The particular strength of the articles in Kaiserโ€™s issue of the journal is that they present real data, based on good measures and a comprehensive set of competencies, data that show clearly how the requirements of management jobs change with changes in organisational status. The published literature on this topic is quite large and somewhat complex.

I believe I can summarise the major lessons of the literature in terms of four points.

  1. The first point is that management levels can be usefully conceptualised in terms of three categories:ย  (1) Supervisors, who are responsible for organising employeesโ€™ work, assigning tasks, and holding people accountable for their performance; (2) Managers, who coordinate the efforts of work teams with the requests of top management; (3) Executives, who set the direction for the organisation. Even with these simple definitions it is apparent that people do different things at different levels of management.
  2. The second point is that De Meuse, et al. (2011) show that certain prominent competencies (e.g., Humour, Personal Disclosure, and Compassion), are irrelevant. Specifically, ratings for sense of humour, willingness to disclose, and showing compassion are uncorrelated with managerial performance at any level. Consider Personal Disclosure. It is defined as โ€œโ€ฆwilling to share thoughts about personal strengths, weaknesses, and limitations; admits mistakes and shortcomings; is open about personal beliefs and feelings; is easy to get to know for those who interact with him/her regularly.โ€ Personal Disclosure is the core of Authentic Leadership theory and these data indicate that it is irrelevant for managerial performance.
  3. The third point is that certain competencies are in fact important at any level. These include Customer Focus, Functional/Technical Skills, Decision Quality, and Ethics and Values. I canโ€™t resist noting that these competencies are at the core of the โ€œHogan Leadership Model.โ€ The data provided by Kaiser, et al. (2011) contain two interesting findings. The first concerns the importance of being decisive versus being participative when making decisions. Effective Managers are rated as high decisive, low participative, whereas effective Executives are rated as low decisive, high participative. Second, Kaiserโ€™s data indicate that โ€œlearning agilityโ€ is needed at every managerial level, and that โ€œabrasivenessโ€ is undesirable at any level. These data are consistent with Kaiserโ€™s claim that adaptability (i.e., learning agility) is the โ€œgโ€ factor in managerial performance.
  4. The last point is that certain competencies are important for Supervisors, even more important for Managers, and crucial for Executives. These competencies are Managerial Courage, Command Skills, Business Acumen, and Perspective. This is also consistent with our leadership model.

These four points summarise what we know in a data-based way about how managersโ€™ jobs change as they move up organisational hierarchies.

I would like to close with two observations, the first concerns the practical consequences of these data, the second concerns a shortcoming in these analyses. Regarding the practical consequences, executive coaches all know that many managers fail after being promoted. A common cause of failure concerns being unable to adapt to the promotion. We distinguish betweenย workingย inย the businessย andย workingย onย the business. Working in the business involves assigning tasks, giving clear instructions, and holding people accountable. Working on the business means putting problems in perspective, evaluating past decisions based on present evidence, and anticipating problems based on potential changes in customer demands. This involves the distinction between tactical and strategic thinking. Tactical thinking concerns implementation issues, budget allocation, and short-term deadlines; strategic thinking concerns innovation, profit generation, and longer-term opportunities. Smart, hardworking, honest executives often fail because they focus on tactical issues at the expense of strategic opportunities.

The second problem with discussions of leadership based on competency models concerns the problem of derailment. The data show that 65% to 75% of existing managers struggle to perform well at any level. Competency models focus on strengths, but as Rob Kaiser tells us, strengths become problems when they are overused; thus, more of any competency is not always better. Conversely, more versatility (or learning agility) is always better. In addition, Kaiserโ€™s data also show that unpleasant tendencies (e.g., abrasiveness) can co-exist with important strengths, and the unpleasant tendencies can cancel the benefits of important strengths. All of this suggests that competency-based analyses of leadership need to be qualified by considerations of versatility and the dark side of personality.

 

References

Bibliography

  1. De Meuse, K.P., Dai, G. & Wu, J. (2011). Leadership skills across organizational levels.ย ย The Psychologistโ€“Manager Journal, 14, 120-139.
  2. Kaiser, R.B., Craig S.B. Overfield, D.V., & Yarborough, P. (2011).ย  Differences in managerial jobs at the bottom, middle, and top.ย ย The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 14, 76-91.
  • This article originally appeared onย Hogan Assessmentsย and was written by Dr Robert Hogan.

 

TOPIC AREA

DATE POSTED

May 14, 2020

SHARE ON YOUR SOCIALS

Latest blog posts

Loading...

The Dark Side of Creativity: How Imagination Derails Performance

Predicting Athletic Performance with Personality Assessment

PBC Webinar – Measuring What Matters: A Smarter Way to Lead Safer Workplaces

Webinar: Customising the Hogan 360: Why, When and How

Enabling the SES Performance Leadership Framework through leveraging the Hogan 360 in Development

Questions?

Weโ€™re here
to help.

Contact Us

Get certified
today

Gain comprehensive training on how to use Hoganโ€™s personality assessments

Get Certified Now

Related Articles

The Dark Side of Creativity: How Imagination Derails Performance

Most of us have encountered a leader who uses meetings as personal brainstorming time. Everyone leaves feeling confused or uncertain…
Read More

Predicting Athletic Performance with Personality Assessment

Can personality predict the success of professional athletes? Whether helping NBA teams predict rookie-year performance or NFL teams perfect their…
Read More

PBC Webinar – Measuring What Matters: A Smarter Way to Lead Safer Workplaces

๐Ÿ“…30 October 2025 ๐Ÿ•‘10:00-11:00 AM (AEDT) | 12:00-1:00 PM (NZDT) Join Dr. Xander Van Lill and Andrew Morris on 30…
Read More
View All

Stay connected

Copyright 2024 Peter Berry Consultancy.

Sydney

Level 8/201 Miller Street,
North Sydney, NSW 2060 Australia

Phone: +61 2 8918 0888

Peter Berry Consultancy wishes to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians the Cammeraygal and their Country on which we work today.

See map

Melbourne

Suite 303, 430 Little Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000 Australia

Phone: +61 3 8629 5100

Peter Berry Consultancy wishes to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians the Boon Wurrung and Woiwurrung (Wurundjeri) peoples of the Kulin Nation and their Country on which we work today.

See map

Auckland

11 Britomart Place, Auckland CBD,
Auckland 1010, New Zealand

Phone: +64 9 941 9790

See map

Ireland

Suite 301, 53 Merrion Square South, Dublin 2, D02 PR63, Ireland

Phone: +353 1 578 3607

See map
  • TERMS & CONDITIONS
  • PRIVACY POLICY – AU
  • PRIVACY POLICY โ€“ NZ
  • COOKIES POLICY
  • EU COMPLIANCE
  • TERMS & CONDITIONS
  • PRIVACY POLICY – AU
  • PRIVACY POLICY โ€“ NZ
  • COOKIES POLICY
  • EU COMPLIANCE
  • TERMS & CONDITIONS
  • PRIVACY POLICY – AU
  • PRIVACY POLICY โ€“ NZ
  • COOKIES POLICY
  • EU COMPLIANCE
  • TERMS & CONDITIONS
  • PRIVACY POLICY – AU
  • PRIVACY POLICY โ€“ NZ
  • COOKIES POLICY
  • EU COMPLIANCE
Peter Berry Consultancy
Manage Consent

PBC uses cookies. Learn more about our policies by clicking the links below.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}